Strained explanations, cartoonish debates and zebra issues
Just a couple snippets from my dial-up dungeon:
I’ll begin with Arlen Specter offering his two cents on warrantless surveillance, which gave me some sliver of hope that these hearings won’t just be another yes-man forum in our post-9/11 world.*
And then there was Christopher Hitchens writing about the Muslim cartoon controversy. I have to admit I share some of his discomfort surrounding the statement of our government on this front. Are we not allowed to make critical commentary on religion, or is it just “unacceptable”—and what does that mean exactly? **
And then there was the extra-large football game. I’ll confess that I didn’t have a clear rooting interest, so it was hard to be thrilled with any outcome. That said, I feel a little happy for guys like Bill Cowher and Jerome Bettis, even if the game showcased some glaring zebra defficiencies along the way—I’m always left a little unsettled when bad calls play a big part in deciding games.
*Chris seems less optimistic about Specter.
**Cziltang has thoughts on the ‘toon controversy here and here. In addition, The Philadelphia Inquirer (one of very few U.S. newspapers to publish any of the aforementioned cartoons) carried this op-ed on 2/05/06.
3 Comments